data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69fda/69fda4a5bfe00d909449685b474a26301a13d47f" alt="Second life copybot viewer tpb"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e438/1e438ae144695d39cf78524f7d8bcc49a5abd207" alt="second life copybot viewer tpb second life copybot viewer tpb"
Only download viewers from this site, and be sure to read the disclaimer too.ĭo not click Links in Second Life even from your friends that link to market place unless you are absolute sure to check the web address before putting any information in the login box.ĭo not download any of the following viewers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f1ba/7f1ba423b0457960aedd6b627d2266e5ed44954c" alt="second life copybot viewer tpb second life copybot viewer tpb"
These groups are known CopyBotters, and Second Life Account Hackers, In late 2012 One of the people from their site, Hacked my Second Life Account as well as quite a few other accounts from people I know and have been phishing other Merchants in Second Life through fake marketplace links, and cool hack viewers. It's important to understand that the viewers in the list are self certified by the viewer developer and are not tested or endorsed by LL and that is clearly stated on the TPV listing page.ĭo not download viewers from Goon Squad, or KingGoon. However, I am NOT required to have my viewer listed in the directory in order to be "allowed" as long as it meets the terms set. In other words, I am permitted to compile a viewer and use it myself as long as I agree to the terms as set by LL, I can give it to others and they too may use my viewer. However, there is nothing that prevents the use of viewers that are NOT on that list as long as they also meet the TPV rules and abide by the SL TOS. The TPV list only lists viewers where the developers agree to abide by the TPV terms and SL TOS and have self certified that they do so. Trinity forgive me for being slightly pedantic here but the above isn't accurate although I understand your intent. I hope LL will be able to fix for you, but i wouldnt expect too much about your inventory or anything else you lost. All readily available, all seconds away from your fingertips. There's just way too much information out there, way too much. Especially when there is no reason to NOT be informed of them. It's best not to take any chances if you'd prefer your butt stay safe. You won't know beforehand which one you'll get. Sometimes those swift kicks are really a boot up the rear end. Sometimes, we need a swift kick in the pants. It doesn't mean we deserve what we get, all the time, but it also doesn't mean we don't deserve any of it. The reason this happens, is that they know there are people who won't read. When we don't, this sort of thing happens. But the rest of me is a reasonable man that says you should always, always, always read the fine print before you click yes, I agree, continue, or whatever other terms they come up with. Because I am human and I do, a little bit. It's also not to say I don't feel a little bad your account was hacked. I wouldn't complain if they do, it's for your benefit after all.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c0bd/1c0bd0b0abae4a9d5c423b794b95a1015b81d74c" alt="second life copybot viewer tpb second life copybot viewer tpb"
Don't be surprised if the lab makes you jump through hoops to get the account back, though. That's not to say you haven't, obviously you know now that was a bad idea. It's a matter of wanting people to take personal responsibility. So it's not a matter of being on their side or something. Very few would ever support what they do. I'm sorry if you believe that opinion is mean, but it's truthful and sometimes the truth hurts. The only people that sign up are either A-people like yourself who don't read fine print, medium print or even bold print, or B-people interested in doing exactly what they do. If you had read, you wouldn't have signed up. I am going to guess you read nothing before signing up. There is so much documentation and information out there on the web about them, what they do, how they operate and such. Nick Carr has covered many of the issues in Knockoffs roil Second Life and The dingo stole my avatar.Umm, their site, sites I should say, make absolutely no bones about being upfront. It will probably just lead to the creation of more tools that do the same job. Of course, even if CopyBot is blocked, it won't end the problem. That's why CopyBot is a threat to this particular virtual civilisation. What makes Second Life attractive today - especially to large corporations - is the opportunity to control their intellectual property and make money. "Even avatars have been copied right in front of people's faces, so that they were looking into a mirror," in-world resident CaveCub Milk wroteĬomment: There have been plenty of virtual worlds before, starting with MUD (Multi-User Dungeon) at Essex University in the early 80s, and growing through Worlds Away (now VZones), which had a graphical world with avatars over a decade ago. CopyBot was created as a debugging tool, but was altered by someone outside the group so it could be used to copy objects within Second Life.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d5e1/6d5e162201b43f5c99025579c7db288cbae965a4" alt="second life copybot viewer tpb second life copybot viewer tpb"
The group works with Linden Lab to identify vulnerabilities in the system that could be exploited by malicious users.
#Second life copybot viewer tpb software#
The controversy revolves around the software tool CopyBot, developed by the open-source group Libsecondlife.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69fda/69fda4a5bfe00d909449685b474a26301a13d47f" alt="Second life copybot viewer tpb"